Most teams only find UX and accessibility problems after users hit them, through support tickets, churn or a failed audit. And when issues are found, they often arrive as a slide deck of opinions nobody can act on.
SecretUXD grounds every finding in the standards designers already trust, points to the exact element, and hands engineers the code to fix it.
10
Nielsen heuristics mapped
WCAG 2.2
AA success criteria
< 60s
to a first audit
100%
of findings with evidence
The engineering and design rules that govern every feature we ship.
Every important finding shows the DOM evidence, the affected element's bounding box, the rationale and the rule it breaks.
A finding must lead to a clear CSS/HTML fix and code guidance, not just vague criticism.
We show whether a result comes from an automated rule check, visual AI inference, behavioural data, or needs human validation.
We never claim that automated scans alone prove a product is fully usable or accessibility compliant.
The core audit stays fast and simple. Behaviour analytics, Figma QA and experimentation arrive only when you need them.
If we can't show you the evidence, we won't show you the finding.
Why we build SecretUXD today, and the future we're working towards.
We help product teams catch visual UI issues, usability gaps and accessibility barriers early, explain each one with evidence, and hand over a clear fix, so every improvement is measurable.
We see a future where UI and UX quality is checked as routinely as code, where polished interfaces and effortless experiences are the standard, not the exception, and no user is left out.
Test your product for UX, WCAG accessibility and visual hierarchy issues in under a minute.